North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences

In adopting a leadership role as an environmentally responsible cultural institution, and institution would commit to pursuing some or all of the following:

• Measure and make public its environmental impacts; set goals for continuous improvement; and evaluate progress and effectiveness.
• Develop a plan and timeframe for becoming climate neutral, and eventually climate positive.
• Demonstrate leadership by exceeding existing environmental codes, regulations, and professional standards as appropriate, e.g. setting energy efficiency goals that would be higher than what existing regulations require.
• Review investments and set a timeframe for investing in a socially responsible portfolio that excludes fossil fuel companies.
• Identify risks resulting from climate change, and take steps to anticipate and mitigate risks and damage for itself and, in collaboration, on behalf of the community.

The long-held practice of creating object exhibition and storage climate conditions of 70० +/-2० and 50% +/- 5% principle is no longer considered best practice. Instead, curators and conservators are determining appropriate conditions based on the conservation needs and history of the object and its materials, and by applying scientifically-proven concepts of materials’ conservation needs and thresholds, and the safe energy savings of night-time and seasonal drift to care for the objects while saving significantly on energy use.

Institutions can significantly reduce the impact of materials use through life-cycle planning, choosing low-impact materials, and developing convenient, clear, waste-management approaches. Begin by conducting materials or waste audits for regular activities such as exhibit construction, special events, office operations, food service areas, and gift shops. Then, by piloting new practices in specific departments or single events or time periods, you can develop tools and procedures that significantly reduce waste through simple practices. Associated with this commitment, institutions could:

• Commit to Zero Waste (90% diversion from landfil)
  • Recommended Targets:
    • Divert 60/75/85% institutional waste from landfil by 2020/2025/2030
    • Reach zero waste to landfill by 2030
    • Set construction waste diversion targets by project
• Commit to Eliminating Single-Use Consumer Plastics
  • Recommended Targets:
    • Eliminate single use water bottles on site by 2020
    • Institute a plastic bag ban on site by 2020
    • Eliminate single use beverage bottles on site by 2022

Commit to offering education opportunities that are designed for staff, adults, and children, and feature information on clean energy, stewardship, individual/household climate actions, climate advocacy, and any other applicable subjects. The importance of building environmental literacy in changing habits and perceptions is profound, and organizations and institutions trusted to convene the community are among the most impactful educators.

There are many ways to reduce the climate impact of packaging including reducing materials (i.e., “source reduction”); replacing virgin materials with post-consumer recycled content; replacing traditional plastics made from fossil fuels with biopolymers; re-designing packaging to be more compact and therefore efficient for transport and storage; using biodegradable packing materials; and recycling at end of the packaging’s life to name just a few practices.

While individual organization action is necessary, local and federal government action is also needed to reach global climate goals. Your organization can have a critical voice in advancing public policy. A commitment to responsible engagement in climate policy means that your organization commits to supporting public policy to: promote energy efficiency and renewable energy; increase investment in a clean energy economy; support climate change adaptation, or put a price on carbon.